Assessment of the efficacy and toxicity of 131I- metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy for metastatic neuroendocrine tumours

24Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-MIBG) is a licensed palliative treatment for patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours. We have retrospectively assessed the consequences of 131I-MIBG therapy in 48 patients (30 gastroenteropancreatic, 6 pulmonary, 12 unknown primary site) with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours attending Royal Liverpool University Hospital between 1996 and 2006. Mean age at diagnosis was 57.6 years (range 34-81). 131I-MIBG was administered on 88 occasions (mean 1.8 treatments, range 1-4). Twenty-nine patients had biochemical markers measured before and after 131I-MIBG, of whom 11 (36.7%) showed >50% reduction in levels post-therapy. Forty patients had radiological investigations performed after 131I-MIBG, of whom 11(27.5%) showed reduction in tumour size post-therapy. Twenty-seven (56.3%) patients reported improved symptoms after 131I-MIBG therapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly increased survival (P=0.01) from the date of first 131I-MIBG in patients who reported symptomatic benefit from therapy. Patients with biochemical and radiological responses did not show any statistically significant alteration in survival compared to non-responders. Eleven (22.9%) patients required hospitalisation as a consequence of complications, mostly due to mild bone marrow suppression. 131I-MIBG therefore improved symptoms in more than half of the patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours and survival was increased in those patients who reported a symptomatic response to therapy. © 2008 Cancer Research UK.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nwosu, A. C., Jones, L., Vora, J., Poston, G. J., Vinjamuri, S., & Pritchard, D. M. (2008). Assessment of the efficacy and toxicity of 131I- metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy for metastatic neuroendocrine tumours. British Journal of Cancer, 98(6), 1053–1058. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604273

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free