Measuring scientific value of Indian journals beyond impact factor: A case with physics-chemistry-biology journals

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Qualitative scientific journals play a vital role in scholarly communication processes. However, during the last few years, there is a mushroom growth of journals in every discipline in India. There has been no single source of systematic advice on how to measure the scientific value of Indian journals. The present study is an attempt to minimize the gap by developing a mechanism for measuring scientific value of Indian journals. Consulting various international databases and their journal inclusion policy, a viable mechanism has been devised and tested with 100+ Indian journals in the fields of physics, chemistry and biology. The results indicate that although the quantity of yearly additions of new journals in each of the three disciplines is quite impressive, the yearly discontinuation is also alarming. Almost 29% of physics journals, 11% of chemistry journals and 21% of biology journals were stopped within a year. Although irregularity in publication, improper execution of review process, non-disclosure of article processing charges, lower percentage of foreign contributors and low citation rate were identified as some drawbacks with Indian physics, chemistry and biology journals. The percentage of predatory journals in these three disciplines is quite less till date. In order to choose a better platform of scholarly publishing, this study suggests some recommendations for prospective authors.

References Powered by Scopus

Predatory publishers are corrupting open access

710Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

'Predatory' open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics

606Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The “green” and “gold” roads to open access: The case for mixing and matching

86Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Methodological considerations for identifying questionable publishing in a national context: The case of swedish higher education institutions

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Comparative Analysis of Editorial Leaders' Profiles of Major and Non-Western Library and Information Science Journals

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mukherjee, B. (2018). Measuring scientific value of Indian journals beyond impact factor: A case with physics-chemistry-biology journals. Current Science, 114(8), 1613–1623. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i08/1613-1623

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

57%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

14%

Arts and Humanities 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 6

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free