Stability Comparison between Grid-forming and Grid-following Based Wind Farms Integrated MMC-HVDC

41Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Grid-forming (GFM) control based high-voltage DC (HVDC) systems and renewable energy sources (RESs) provide support for enhancing the stability of power systems. However, the interaction and coordination of frequency support between the GFM-based modular multilevel converter based HVDC (MMC-HVDC) and grid-following (GFL) based RESs or GFM-based RESs have not been fully investigated, which are examined in this study. First, the detailed AC- and DC-side impedances of GFM-based MMC-HVDC are analyzed. The impedance characteristics of GFL- and GFM-based wind turbines are next analyzed. Then, the influences of GFL- and GFM-based wind farms (WFs) on the DC- and AC-side stabilities of WF-integrated MMC-HVDC systems are compared and evaluated. The results show that the GFM-based wind turbine performs better than the GFL-based wind turbine. Accordingly, to support a receiving-end AC system, the corresponding frequency supporting strategies are proposed based on the GFM control for WF-integrated MMC-HVDC systems. The GFM-based WF outperforms the GFL-based WF in terms of stability and response time. Simulations in PSCAD/EMTDC demonstrate the DC- and AC-side stability issues and seamless grid support from the RESs, i.e., WFs, to the receiving-end AC system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pan, R., Liu, D., Liu, S., Yang, J., Kou, L., & Tang, G. (2023). Stability Comparison between Grid-forming and Grid-following Based Wind Farms Integrated MMC-HVDC. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 11(4), 1341–1355. https://doi.org/10.35833/MPCE.2022.000158

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free