Morphologic outcome of bimaxillary surgery–an anthropometric appraisal

15Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To adequately perform orthognathic surgery procedures, it is from basic interest to understand the morphologic changes caused by orthognathic surgery. Anthropometric analyses of standardized frontal view and profle photographs could help to investigate and understand such changes. Study Design: We present a pre- to postoperative evaluation of orthognathic surgery results based on anthropo-metric indices described by Farkas and cephalometric measurements. 30 Class III patients undergoing maxillary advancement by Le Fort I Osteotomy and mandibular setback by bilateral sagittal split osteotomy were evaluated. Preoperative as well as three and nine months postoperative lateral cephalograms as well as standardized frontal view and profle photographs were taken. On the photographs 21 anthropometric indices given by Farkas were evaluated. In cephalograms SNA and SNB angle as well as Wits appraisal were investigated. Results: The investigated anthropometric indices showed a signifcant increase of the vertical height of the upper lip without changing the relation of the upper vermilion to the cutaneous upper lip. The lower vermilion height increased relatively to the cutaneous lower lip without vertical changes in the lower lip. Due to maxillary advancement the upper face height increased meanwhile the lower face height decreased due to mandibular setback. SNA and SNB angle and Wits appraisal showed typical changes related to surgery. Conclusions: The investigated photo-assisted anthropometric measurements presented reproducible results related to bimaxillary surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raschke, G. F., Rieger, U. M., Peisker, A., Djedovic, G., Gomez-Dammeier, M., Guentsch, A., … Schultze-Mosgau, S. (2015). Morphologic outcome of bimaxillary surgery–an anthropometric appraisal. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 20(1), e103–e110. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.19978

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free