From Boom to Bust: How Different Has Microfinance Been from Traditional Banking?

35Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article presents in-depth analysis of developments in the microfinance sector before and after the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008, by comparing them with developments in the traditional banking sectors of emerging markets and developing countries. Its findings indicate that microfinance has been part of the same credit boom observed in the traditional banking sector, and that the boom was also fostered by substantial inflows of foreign capital. Further, that risks associated with credit booms in the traditional sector also evolved in the microfinance sector. The article comes to the conclusion that, by becoming part of the global financial system, microfinance has lost one of the characteristics distinguishing it from traditional banking, namely, its greater resilience to crises in domestic and global financial markets. © The Authors 2012. Development Policy Review © 2012 Overseas Development Institute.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wagner, C. (2012). From Boom to Bust: How Different Has Microfinance Been from Traditional Banking? Development Policy Review, 30(2), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2012.00571.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free