Evaluating on-board kVCT- and MVCT-based dose calculation accuracy using a thorax phantom for helical tomotherapy treatments

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate the impact of CT number calibration and imaging parameter selection on dose calculation accuracy relative to the CT planning process in thoracic treatments for on-board helical CT imaging systems used in helical tomotherapy. Methods and Materials. Direct CT number calibrations were performed with appropriate protocols for each imaging system using an electron density phantom. Large volume and SBRT treatment plans were simulated and optimized for planning CT scans of an anthropomorphic thorax phantom and transferred to registered kVCT and MVCT scans of the phantom as appropriate. Relevant DVH metrics and dose-difference maps were used to evaluate and compare dose calculation accuracy relative to the planning CT based on a variation in imaging parameters applied for the on-board systems. Results. For helical kVCT scans of the thorax phantom, median differences in DVH parameters for the large volume treatment plan were less than ±1% with dose to the target volume either over- or underestimated depending on the imaging parameters utilized for CT number calibration and thorax phantom acquisition. For the lung SBRT plan calculated on helical kVCT scans, median dose differences were up to -2.7% with a more noticeable dependence on parameter selection. For MVCT scans, median dose differences for the large volume plan were within +2% with dose to the target overestimated regardless of the imaging protocol. Conclusion. Accurate dose calculations (median errors of

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tegtmeier, R. C., Ferris, W. S., Chen, R., Miller, J. R., Bayouth, J. E., & Culberson, W. S. (2023). Evaluating on-board kVCT- and MVCT-based dose calculation accuracy using a thorax phantom for helical tomotherapy treatments. Biomedical Physics and Engineering Express, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/acb93f

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free