Evaluation of endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations (EBUS-FNA): Correlation with adequacy and histologic follow-up

Abstract

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) is a minimally invasive modality for diagnosing mediastinal lesions. When determining adequacy, EBUS-FNAs are evaluated for diagnostic material or sufficient lymphoid tissue. In this study, the authors evaluated their experience with EBUS-FNAs and correlated the findings with adequacy and histologic follow-up. METHODS: EBUS-FNAs were retrospectively reviewed over a 3-year period and correlated with the clinicopathologic findings, adequacy, and histologic follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 593 EBUS-FNAs were obtained from 356 patients, including 420 (71%) satisfactory (SAT) cases, 107 (18%) less than optimal (LTO) cases, and 66 (11%) unsatisfactory (UNSAT) cases. The overall diagnostic yield was 71%, and the mediastinal (N2) lymph nodes had better yield (72%) than the peripheral intrapulmonary and hilar (N1) lymph nodes (64%). Histologic follow-up was available in 203 cases (34%), and malignancy was identified in 7 UNSAT cases (23%), 6 LTO-negative cases (11%), and 4 SAT cases (3%) with a negative cytologic diagnosis. In the suboptimal cases with follow-up, 79% were benign and 21% were malignant on follow-up, including 25 (14%) with fibrosis or hyalinization. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values in the study were 80%, 100%, 100%, and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current data demonstrated that EBUS-FNA has good sensitivity, high specificity, and a higher diagnostic yield for N2 lymph nodes compared with N1 lymph nodes. The data also illustrate the finding that suboptimal cases have a greater risk of falsenegative diagnoses and a 21% chance of malignancy, including processes with fibrosis or hyalinization. © 2013 American Cancer Society.