Least general generalizations in description logic: Verification and existence

17Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We study two forms of least general generalizations in description logic, the least common subsumer (LCS) and most specific concept (MSC). While the LCS generalizes from examples that take the form of concepts, the MSC generalizes from individuals in data. Our focus is on the complexity of existence and verification, the latter meaning to decide whether a candidate concept is the LCS or MSC. We consider cases with and without a background TBox and a target signature. Our results range from CONP-complete for LCS and MSC verification in the description logic EL without TBoxes to undecidability of LCS and MSC verification and existence in ELI with TBoxes. To obtain results in the presence of a TBox, we establish a close link between the problems studied in this paper and concept learning from positive and negative examples. We also give a way to regain decidability in ELI with TBoxes and study single example MSC as a special case.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jung, J. C., Lutz, C., & Wolter, F. (2020). Least general generalizations in description logic: Verification and existence. In AAAI 2020 - 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 2854–2861). AAAI press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i03.5675

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free