Comparison of P wave durations as assessed with the bipolar and unipolar atrial intracardiac electrograms: Applicability to quickOpt™

0Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Studies have shown that inter-atrial conduction time (IACT) can be used to estimate optimal PV delays. QuickOpt utilizes the atrial EGM (AEGM) and measures P-wave duration (PW) to estimate the IACT. This study compares PW between bipolar (Bi) and unipolar (Uni) AEGMs in patients with either a pacemaker (PP) or a CRT-D pulse generator. Bipolar (Bi) and Unipolar (Uni) AEGMs were obtained from 42 PP and 18 CRT-D pts. In the PP, PWs associated with Bi and Uni AEGMs were close (114±19 ms vs. 110±20 ms). Intra-patient difference was 3.9±8.7 ms, and the 95% confidence interval for the difference was (1.2, 6.6). With CRT-D, PWs were 79±18.4 ms and 81±14 ms for Bi and Uni sensing and the intra-patient difference was -1.2±14.9 ms. In 18 PP, the difference between ECG and either bipolar or unipolar PW was 4.8±17.8 ms and 0.9 ms ± 15.5 ms respectively. PWs were similar between unipolar AEGMs, bipolar AEGMs, and surface ECG.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Min, X., Demers, P., Muller, D., Snell, J. D., Levine, P. A., & Ostrow, E. L. (2007). Comparison of P wave durations as assessed with the bipolar and unipolar atrial intracardiac electrograms: Applicability to quickOptTM. In Computers in Cardiology (Vol. 34, pp. 773–776). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2007.4745600

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free