Depression: The ambivalence of diagnosis

61Citations
Citations of this article
126Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The diagnosis of depression in the clinical context is extremely controversial and is subject to criticism of over-medicalisation and pharmaceuticalisation. Depression can be conceptualised across the entire spectrum of lay and medical belief, from the 'normal' highs and lows of the human condition to its inclusion in the dominant Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders classificatory system, as a form of serious mental illness. In this context, a better understanding of how people describe, experience, negotiate and participate in the process of diagnosis is needed. This article draws on qualitative interviews to explore lay accounts of being diagnosed with depression. The findings reveal that lay accounts of depression vacillate in and out of the medicalised discourse of depression, highlighting the limitations of the biomedical approach to diagnosis and treatment. © 2012 The Authors. Sociology of Health & Illness © 2012 Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness/Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kokanovic, R., Bendelow, G., & Philip, B. (2013). Depression: The ambivalence of diagnosis. Sociology of Health and Illness, 35(3), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01486.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free