Topsoil replacement depth and organic amendment effects on plant nutrient uptake from reclaimed natural gas wellsites

11Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sustained plant nutrient availability on reclaimed wellsites is critical to the successful restoration of crop productivity. This study evaluated topsoil replacement depth (TRD) (0, 50, 100, and 150% of mandatory TRD) and organic amendment [beef cattle feedlot manure, compost derived from straw-bedded cattle feedlot manure, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw, alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) hay, and unamended control] effects on nutrient uptake by a wheat crop at three abandoned gas wellsites in south-central Alberta. Grain N uptake increased by 0.055 kg ha-1 for each percent increase in TRD, reflecting the corresponding linear increase in grain N concentration. Low carbon to nitrogen (C:N) ratio amendments, particularly compost and alfalfa, were the most effective for improving grain N concentration and uptake. Conversely, N concentration and uptake were lowest for the high C:N (53:1) wheat straw amendment. Reclamation programs should, therefore, consider incorporation of the low C:N alfalfa or compost in order to safeguard against N deficiency in the first 1-2 yr following reclamation. Our results also show that high P amendments, such as manure and compost, are better choices for improving P uptake by spring wheat. These results emphasize the importance of topsoil replacement and amendment quality (C:N ratio and P concentration) in ensuring adequate N and P supply in the 1-2 yr following reclamation. Based on this, compost appears to be the best single amendment for ensuring enhanced uptake of both N and P on reclaimed wellsites in the short term.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zvomuya, F., Larney, F. J., Akinremi, O. O., Lemke, R. L., & Klaassen, V. E. (2006). Topsoil replacement depth and organic amendment effects on plant nutrient uptake from reclaimed natural gas wellsites. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 86(5), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.4141/S06-003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free