Abstract
Democratic regression has become a worrying phenomenon in the last years. Social science has provided a variety of explanations why democratic regimes have lost democratic regime quality. Against this backdrop, I take stock of the recent literature by putting forward two important analytical distinctions that we should make more explicit. First, I propose to classify our current explanations along the source where the cause for the malaise originated. By doing so, I introduce a distinction between erosion and decay type of arguments. While the former is a gradual process that is caused exogenously–like wind or water hitting a stone–the latter is caused endogenously–like the half-life in nuclear decay processes. Second, I draw a distinction between the endogenous or exogenous roots of the cause and the subsequent causal mechanism that connects the cause with the outcome. I outline the need for dissecting a causal mechanism into its constitutive components and highlight its underlying dimensions of temporality. Throughout the article, I use empirical case material as well as relevant secondary literature to illustrate these points.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Gerschewski, J. (2021). Erosion or decay? Conceptualizing causes and mechanisms of democratic regression. Democratization, 28(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1826935
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.