The prevalence and implications of copepod behavioral responses to oceanographic gradients and biological patchiness

27Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Several species and developmental stages of calanoid copepods were tested for responses to environmental cues in a laboratory apparatus that mimicked conditions commonly associated with patches of food in the ocean. All species responded to the presence of phytoplankton by feeding. All species responded by increasing proportional residence time in one, but not both, of the treatments defined by gradients of velocity or density. Most species increased swimming speed and frequency of turning in response to the presence of chemical exudates or gradients of velocity. Only one species, Eurytemora affinis, increased proportional time of residence in response to gradients in density of the water. Responses of E. affinis to combined cues did not definitively demonstrate a hierarchical use of different cues as previously observed for Temora longicornis and Acartia tonsa. A simple foraging simulation was developed to assess the applicability in the field of the behavioral results observed in the laboratory. These simulations suggest that observed fine-scale behaviors could lead to copepod aggregations observed in situ. The present study demonstrates that behavioral response to cues associated with fine-scale oceanographic gradients and biological patchiness is functionally important and prevalent among copepods and likely has significant impacts on larger-scale distributional patterns. © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Woodson, C. B., Webster, D. R., Weissburg, M. J., & Yen, J. (2007). The prevalence and implications of copepod behavioral responses to oceanographic gradients and biological patchiness. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 47(6), 831–846. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icm091

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free