Regrafting of the split-thickness skin graft donor-site: Is it beneficial?

6Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Split-thickness skin grafting remains a fundamental treatment for patients with deep burns and other traumatic injuries. Unfortunately, the donor site wound that remains after split skin graft (SSG) harvesting may also cause problems for the patient; they can lead to discomfort and scars with a poor cosmetic outcome. Regrafting of the donor site is one of the methods described to improve donor site healing and scarring. In this report, we describe a case of a 26-year-old woman with a self-inflicted chemical burn (0.5% TBSA) who underwent split skin grafting. During surgery, only part of the donor site was regrafted with split skin graft remnants. This part healed faster and had a better scar quality at 3 months postsurgery. Nevertheless, the appearance and patients’ opinion on the regrafted part deteriorated after 12 months. With this case report, we aim to create awareness of the long-term consequences of regrafting, which may differ from short-time results. Patients expected to have poor reepithelialization potential may benefit from regrafting of the SSG on the donor site. But in healthy young individuals, timewise there would be no benefit since it can lead to an aesthetically displeasing result.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Legemate, C. M., Lucas, Y., Oen, I. M. M. H., & van der Vlies, C. H. (2020). Regrafting of the split-thickness skin graft donor-site: Is it beneficial? Journal of Burn Care and Research, 41(1), 211–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irz166

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free