Comparison of sterile normal saline and 1% povidone-iodine for vaginal preparation in vesicovaginal fistula: a randomised trial

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Vaginal preparation before transvaginal gynecological surgeries improves the success rate. However, there is no consensus on which agent is superior for transvaginal repair of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF). We aimed to compare irritation symptoms and antimicrobial function between sterile normal saline (SS) and 1% povidone-iodine (PI) for vaginal preparation in surgical repair of VVF. Methods: This randomised, controlled trial was conducted on patients with VVF underwent transvaginal repair. Preoperative vaginal irrigation was randomly performed with either SS or 1% PI. The patients’ self-reported symptoms questionnaires, including numerical rating scale (NRS) of pain, Indevus urgency severity scale (IUSS), and vaginal symptoms, tissue edoema degree and pathogenic microbiology were recorded. Results: The study included 30 patients in the SS group and 31 patients in the PI group. After twice irrigations before surgery, compared with the PI group, the SS group had a similar count of bacterial species but a higher bacterial load (p =.079 and p =.033). The NRS of pain and IUSS in the SS group were lower than those in the PI group (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Che, X., Ruan, M., Yang, Y., Xi, Z., Huang, Y., Wang, W., … Wu, S. (2025). Comparison of sterile normal saline and 1% povidone-iodine for vaginal preparation in vesicovaginal fistula: a randomised trial. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2024.2439356

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free