Effect of hypothermic post-treatment on hypoxic-ischemic striatal injury, and normal striatal development, in neonatal rats: A stereological study

15Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Fundamental questions remain about the optimal temperature, duration, and mode of delivery that provide the best striatal neuroprotection from hypothermia after perinatal hypoxia-ischemia. This study used stereological methods to investigate whether a mild (i.e. 2°C) or a moderate (5°C) decrease in whole body temperature, for 6 h immediately postinsult, was neuroprotective for striatal medium-spiny neurons after perinatal hypoxia-ischemia in the rat. This study also investigated whether moderate hypothermia had any effect on normal striatal development. Hypoxia-ischemia or sham hypoxia-ischemia was induced on postnatal day (PN) 7. Pups were kept either normothermic, mildly hypothermic, or moderately hypothermic for 6 h immediately postinsult. The absolute number of striatal medium-spiny neurons was calculated using modern stereological methods. There was no significant difference in the absolute number of medium-spiny neurons in the right striatum after either mild hypothermia or moderate hypothermia. There was also no significant difference in the absolute number of medium-spiny neurons between the control normothermic and the control moderately hypothermic pups. The latter results suggest that moderate hypothermia for 6 h immediately postinsult may be a safe treatment for striatal medium-spiny neurons. Yet, neither mild nor moderate hypothermia alone for 6 h immediately posthypoxia-ischemia is neuroprotective for striatal medium-spiny neurons. © International Pediatrics Research Foundation, Inc. 2007. All Rights Reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Covey, M. V., & Oorschot, D. E. (2007). Effect of hypothermic post-treatment on hypoxic-ischemic striatal injury, and normal striatal development, in neonatal rats: A stereological study. Pediatric Research, 62(6), 646–651. https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e318157d1fe

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free