Comparison between Support Vector Machine and Random Forest for Audio Classification

13Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Machine learning techniques have been in use to identify voice samples. We consider Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) and compare their performance in detecting specific audio samples from a set of samples pertaining to many subjects. In particular, we propose an algorithm that can deal with multiple features for multiple audio samples from more than one subject. This work discusses the application and other implementation issues. As a demonstration, SVM and RF models are trained using voice samples from two subjects. We found out that SVM is 100% accurate and Random Forest is 70% accurate for subject 1, whereas SVM is 60% accurate and Random Forest is 90% accurate for subject 2. Our results show that the performance of SVM and RF varies from subject to subject.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ansari, M. R., Tumpa, S. A., Raya, J. A. F., & Murshed, M. N. (2021). Comparison between Support Vector Machine and Random Forest for Audio Classification. In Proceedings of International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Information Technology, ICECIT 2021. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECIT54077.2021.9641152

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free