Online Learning: A Cognitive Tool for Learning, an Alternative to Traditional Learning Style

  • Fenteng A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Online learning has emerged as a popular and promising tool for knowledge acquisition, and is now considered as an alternative to traditional learning approaches in the contemporary educational landscape. This review article provides a multifaceted perspective on the current state of research concerning online learning. The article examines the cognitive effects of online learning, explores the controversies and debates surrounding this novel mode of education, and evaluates its implications for future research and practice in the field of education. Through an exhaustive analysis of existing literature on online learning, this article presents at least one recent research paper that provides evidence for the effectiveness of online learning as a potent tool for knowledge acquisition. The article’s findings highlight the many advantages of online learning, including its accessibility, affordability, flexibility, and convenience. The research also underscores its potential to democratize access to education across diverse populations. However, this review article acknowledges the attendant controversies and debates surrounding online learning, such as concerns over the quality of online courses, the effectiveness of online instruction, and the implications of online learning for traditional pedagogical practices. The article recognizes these concerns but also highlights the potential of online learning to supplement and augment traditional learning approaches. By citing the latest research, the article demonstrates the importance of evaluating and improving online learning to ensure that it is a viable and effective educational option for students.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fenteng, A. (2023). Online Learning: A Cognitive Tool for Learning, an Alternative to Traditional Learning Style. Psychology, 14(05), 676–686. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2023.145036

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free