Combination of ultrasonic decontamination, soft tissue curettage, and submucosal air polishing with povidone‐iodine application for non‐surgical therapy of peri‐implantitis: 12‐month clinical outcomes

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a concept for non-surgical peri-implantitis combining stepwise mechanical debridement measures with adjuvant Povidone-iodine application with and without systemic antibiotics. METHODS 45 patients with chronic periodontitis comprising 164 screw-typed implants with peri-implantitis were included. Peri-implantitis was defined as radiographic bone loss of >2 mm, probing pocket depth (PD) ≥5 mm with bleeding on probing (BOP). Stepwise treatment of implants was performed with ultrasonic debridement, soft tissue curettage (STC), glycine powder air polishing (GPAP) and a repeated submucosal application of Povidone-iodine. Teeth with PD >4mm were treated simultaneously according to the same concept except STC. In cases with severe periodontitis (N = 24), amoxicillin and metronidazole (AM) were prescribed for 7 days. RESULTS After 12 months, implants treated without AM showed significant reductions (p<0.05) of mean PD (1.4 ± 0.7 mm), CAL (1.3 ± 0.8 mm) and BOP (33.4 ± 17.2%). In deep pockets (PD >6mm) changes of mean PD (2.3 ± 1.3 mm), CAL (2.0 ± 1.6 mm) and BOP (44.0 ± 41.7%) were more pronounced. Intake of AM did not significantly influence the changes of these parameters. However, the reduction of implant sites with PD >4 mm and BOP was significantly higher in patients with AM than in those without AM (31.8 ± 12.6% vs. 20.8 ± 14.7%; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The combination of ultrasonic debridement, STC and GPAP with adjuvant Povidone-iodine led to significant clinical improvements at implants. Systemic antibiotics had limited effects on the reduction of persisting implant sites with treatment need.