Equine laryngoplasty: Effects of three anchoring techniques in the muscular process and three positions for suture implantation in the cricoid cartilage

1Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of three anchoring techniques in the muscular process and three positions of laryngoplasty suture implantation in the cricoid cartilage on abduction of the arytenoid cartilage and interaction with the cricoarytenoid dorsalis (CAD) muscle compartments. Study design: Experimental study. Sample population: Twenty-two cadaveric equine larynges. Methods: Three implantation techniques were assessed in the left muscular process. They were the use of a titanium corkscrew (CS), a standard caudal passage using a Jamshidi needle (JCa), and a standard cranial passage using a Jamshidi needle (JCr). Each was assessed in combination with three caudal locations in the cricoid cartilage (right, left, and left lateral). Each suture combination was tightened to submaximal abduction (Dixon grade 2). Force on the suture, degree of larynx caudal rotation, and CAD muscle indentation were evaluated. Results: The force required for optimal arytenoid cartilage abduction was lower (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maire, U., Ducharme, N. G., Rossignol, A., Campos Schweitzer, A., & Rossignol, F. (2024). Equine laryngoplasty: Effects of three anchoring techniques in the muscular process and three positions for suture implantation in the cricoid cartilage. Veterinary Surgery, 53(7), 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free