Abstract
Objective: The treatment result of the uncovered metallic stent (uncovered MS) and covered metallic stent (covered MS) for unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction is controversial. This time, we conducted this study to compare the efficacies and complication rates of uncovered MS and covered MS in unresectable malignant distal biliary obstructions at a prospective randomized multicenter trial. Materials and methods: From April 2014 to September 2018, patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction were randomly assigned to 2 groups: the uncovered MS group and the covered MS group. Results: 92 treatment results patients were discussed. 48 patients were assigned to the uncovered MS group and 44 cases were assigned to the covered MS group. Both groups showed a drainage effect. No significant difference was found in the drainage effect between the 2 groups. The number of stent occlusion was significantly greater (p =.0467) in uncovered MS (43.8%) comparing with those in covered MS (22.7%). As the cause of stent occlusion, tumor ingrowth was significantly greater (p
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Sakai, Y., Sugiyama, H., Kawaguchi, Y., Kawashima, Y., Hirata, N., Nakaji, S., … Kato, N. (2021). Uncovered versus covered metallic stents for the management of unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a randomized multicenter trial. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 56(10), 1229–1235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2021.1938207
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.