Abstract
Background: Modern radiotherapy techniques are using advanced algorithms; how-ever, phantoms used for quality assurance have homogeneous density; accordingly, the development of heterogeneous phantom mimicking human body sites is imperative to examine variation between planned and delivered doses. Objective: This study aimed to analyze the accuracy of planned dose by different algorithms using indigenously developed heterogeneous thoracic phantom (HT). Material and Methods: In this experimental study, computed tomography (CT) of HT was done, and the density of different parts was measured. The plan was generated on CT images of HCP with 6 and 15 Megavoltage (MV) photon beams using different treatment techniques, including three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Plans were delivered by the linear accelerator, and the dose was measured using the ion chamber (IC) placed in HT; planned and measured doses were compared. Results: Density patterns for different parts of the fabricated phantom, including rib, spine, scapula, lung, chest wall, and heart were 1.849, 1.976, 1.983, 0.173, 0.855, and 0.833 g/cc, respectively. Variation between planned and IC estimated doses with the tolerance (±5%) for all photon energies using different techniques. Acuros-XB (AXB) showed a slightly higher variation between computed and IC estimated doses using HCP compared to the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA). Conclusion: The indigenous heterogeneous phantom can accurately simulate the dosimetric scenario for different algorithms (AXB or AAA) and be also utilized for routine patient-specific QA.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Gangwar, V. K., Gurjar, O. P., Ku-Mar, L., Agarwal, A., Mishra, V. K., Mishra, S. P., & Pandey, S. (2022). Dosimetric Evaluation of the Treatment Plan on Indigenous Heterogeneous Phantoms using Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm and Acuros-XB Algorithm for Different Photon Energies. Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering, 12(3), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2012-1246
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.