Evidence-Based Medicine in Otolaryngology Part 16: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods—Contrasting and Complementary Approaches

3Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Qualitative methods have been increasingly applied in our literature, providing richness to data and incorporating the nuances of patient and family perspectives. These qualitative research techniques provide breadth and depth beyond what can be gleaned through quantitative methods alone. When both quantitative and qualitative approaches are coupled, their findings provide complementary information which can further substantiate study conclusions. We thus aim to provide insight into qualitative and quantitative methods in comparison and contrast to each other, as well as guidance on when each approach is most apt. In relation, we also describe mixed methods and the theory supporting their framework. In doing so, we provide the foundation for an ensuing, more detailed exposition of qualitative methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ikeda, A. K., Suarez-Goris, D., Reich, A. J., Pattisapu, P., Raol, N. P., Randolph, G. W., & Shin, J. J. (2025). Evidence-Based Medicine in Otolaryngology Part 16: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods—Contrasting and Complementary Approaches. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), 172(3), 1092–1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.469

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free