Global heritage governance and women’s everyday (in)security

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The deliberate targeting of heritage sites by the Islamic State (IS) prompted significant international legal and normative developments linking cultural heritage to global security. However, little is known about whether these responses resonate with the experiences of those most affected by the destruction. This article contrasts global governance frameworks with local experiences through a Feminist Security Studies (FSS) lens. Drawing on interviews with Syrian and Iraqi women, the article identifies four themes: heritage as anchored in identity, belonging and female solidarity; its destruction as trauma and persecution articulated through gendered metaphors; as a rupture of cultural rights and traditional practices; and as a force exacerbating women’s fear, displacement and concerns for personal safety. This expands FSS by identifying heritage destruction as a site of gendered violence, while exposing the limits of prevailing global governance frameworks that continue to marginalize women’s perspectives and reproduce gaps between international regimes and everyday (in)security.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Isakhan, B., & Childs, E. (2026). Global heritage governance and women’s everyday (in)security. Globalizations. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2026.2668263

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free