A Co-production Values and Principles Compass to Guide Along the Underused Pathway Comment on “Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact”

6Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Co-production in research is not only encouraged but rapidly becoming a required consideration in health research funding. The challenge in defining co-production continues and the misapplication of co-production has led to growing calls for an emphasis on operationalising the values and principles of co-production in research. This commentary considers Rycroft-Malone and colleagues’ key messages about co-production being more than a set of activities, and reflects on the challenges within the academic sector when applying co-production. The Co-producing Meaningful Principles and Sharing Standards (Co-MPASS) tool offers a way to consider co-production values in the early stages of collaboration. Rather than a stand-alone tool for co-production, it is intended to be used with established methods and published toolboxes to emphasise co-production principles through reflection, conversation, documentation, and learning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Masterson, D., & Laidlaw, L. (2024). A Co-production Values and Principles Compass to Guide Along the Underused Pathway Comment on “Research Coproduction: An Underused Pathway to Impact.” International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.8835

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free