Blood donation, Payment, and non-cash incentives: Classical questions drawing renewed interest

57Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Blood is scarce, and ensuring a sufficient blood supply remains difficult for many countries. Payment for blood as a strategy to increase donations has remained highly controversial for decades, and the debate about ethical issues in paying donors has become somewhat stuck. At least from a policy perspective, it is important to find a compromise which allows for devising and implementing acceptable and successful policies to increase the blood supply. In this paper, such a compromise is developed both from a theoretical and empirical perspective, namely implementing well-designed non-cash incentives which cut across the rigid dichotomy of altruistic donations versus payment for donations. In order for this compromise to work, more attention to donation motives, the choice architecture, and the setting in blood donation needs to be paid. © 2009 S. Karger GmbH.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buyx, A. M. (2009). Blood donation, Payment, and non-cash incentives: Classical questions drawing renewed interest. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1159/000235608

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free