The Scholarly Divide: Insights from the AIS Well-being Project

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the findings from the Information Systems (IS) Well-Being Project that was started in the fall of 2020. There were two goals of this project: 1) to understand the physical, mental, social, and financial well-being of IS academics during the COVID-19 pandemic, and 2) to theorize the downstream effects of the pandemic on the health of the IS research ecosystem. This investigation surfaced a troubling phenomenon that we coined “the IS scholarly divide”. This editorial develops the theoretical underpinnings for the scholarly divide and posits the taxonomy of the divide. Finally, we explore the effects and forward some possible remedies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wright, R. T., Saunders, C., Kankanhalli, A., Tuunainen, V. K., Sarker, S., Whitley, E. A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2023). The Scholarly Divide: Insights from the AIS Well-being Project. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 52, 777–797. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05237

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free