A development bank’s choice of private equity partner: a behavioural game-theoretic approach*

3Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We develop a formal game-theoretic analysis of the economic (value-adding abilities) and behavioural factors (empathy, emotional excitement, passion) affecting a development bank’s choice of private-equity partner when investing into emerging market entrepreneurship. Triple-sided moral hazard (TSMH) problems occur in the form of effort-shirking, since the bank, the PE-manager, and the entrepreneur all contribute to value-creation. The bank’s investment choices are crucially affected by a) the relative abilities and the potential level of empathy, excitement and passion that may be generated between a PE-manager and an entrepreneur, and b) the personal emotional attachment that the bank develops towards a PE. The severity of TSMH increases inefficiencies in decision-making. Finally, we consider, in addition to political risk mitigation, an additional impact that the bank may have on PE/E value-creation: the bank may have a coaching/mentoring role. Our analysis has implications for academics and practitioners alike.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fairchild, R., Crawford, I., & El-Fakir, A. (2019). A development bank’s choice of private equity partner: a behavioural game-theoretic approach*. European Journal of Finance, 25(16), 1510–1526. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2019.1647863

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free