Masculinities, performativity, and subversion: A sociological reappraisal

135Citations
Citations of this article
181Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The study of masculinities has not escaped the influence of Judith Butler's writings on gender, performativity, and subversion. However, this article suggests that Butler's formulations of performativity and subversion express a lack of clarity and engender a number of problems with respect to agency, action, interaction, and social change. This article argues for reformulating performativity and subversion in a more explicitly sociological frame to render the concepts more useful for examining agency and subjectivity in the study of masculinities. The writings of Erving Goffman suggest ways to reclaim the socially constructed agency of "performance" from the mire of "performativity," with the latter's apparent disappearance of subjective action. This article suggests reworking subversion away from parody and resignification toward a consideration of resources for subjectivity and challenges to prevailing social structures. In this way, performativity and subversion may be set more convincingly within a sociologically informed study of masculinity. © 2005 Sage Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brickell, C. (2005). Masculinities, performativity, and subversion: A sociological reappraisal. Men and Masculinities, 8(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03257515

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free