Incomplete Inclusion: Legal Violence and Immigrants in Liminal Legal Statuses

127Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although US political discourse suggests otherwise, no simple dichotomy separates "documented" from "undocumented" immigrants. By examining the integration prospects of immigrants in "liminal" legal standings beyond undocumented status but short of permanent residency, we demonstrate that even when they are legally present, the implementation practices of a multilayered immigration policy regime may cause them harm. Our analyses draw on 108 qualitative interviews with immigrants who have been granted humanitarian relief, including U Visa holders, beneficiaries of the Violence against Women Act provisions, political asylees, and Temporary Protected Status recipients. As a result of "legal violence," these legally present immigrants remain vulnerable to blocked mobility, persistent fear of deportation, and instability, confusion, and self-blame.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abrego, L. J., & Lakhani, S. M. (2015). Incomplete Inclusion: Legal Violence and Immigrants in Liminal Legal Statuses. Law and Policy, 37(4), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12039

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free