BMI and waist circumference as predictors of well-being in older adults: Findings from the English longitudinal study of ageing

41Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the association of BMI and waist circumference (WC), with a quality of life (QoL) indicator designed for older ages (CASP19), and with depressive symptoms (Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale). We included 8,688 individuals aged ≥52 years who participants of Wave 2 (2004-2005) and Wave 3 (2006-2007) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). To explore cross-sectional relationships (2004-2005), we fitted regression models for BMI and WC (included simultaneously) as our predictors of QoL and depressive symptoms adjusted for covariates. To explore longitudinal relationships, BMI and waist at baseline (2004-2005) were related to the each outcome variable measured at follow-up (2006-2007), and adjusted for baseline characteristics (2004-2005). For a given BMI, larger WC was associated with lower QoL and higher risk of depressive symptoms for women in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. By contrast for a given WC increased BMI for women was positively associated with QoL and lower odds of depressive symptoms. In men, for a given BMI, increased WC was related to QoL only cross-sectionally; neither WC nor BMI at baseline were associated with depressive symptoms (cross-sectionally or longitudinally). In conclusion among older people, for a given BMI, increased WC was related with higher risk of poor QoL and, for women, of depressive symptoms; whereas for a given WC, increased BMI had a protective effect on QoL for women. © 2010 The Obesity Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zaninotto, P., Pierce, M., Breeze, E., Oliveira, C. D., & Kumari, M. (2010). BMI and waist circumference as predictors of well-being in older adults: Findings from the English longitudinal study of ageing. Obesity, 18(10), 1981–1987. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2009.497

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free