Tolerance and relative utility: Two proposed indices for comparing change in clinical measurement noise between different populations (repeatability) or measurement methods (agreement)

9Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Reaching a consensus in terms of interchangeability and utility (i.e., disease detection/ monitoring) of a medical device is the eventual aim of repeatability and agreement studies. The aim of the tolerance and relative utility indices described in this report is to provide a methodology to compare change in clinical measurement noise between different populations (repeatability) or measurement methods (agreement), so as to highlight problematic areas. No longitudinal data are required to calculate these indices. Both indices establish a metric of least to most effected across all parameters to facilitate comparison. If validated, these indices may prove useful tools when combining reports and forming the consensus required in the validation process for software updates and new medical devices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bergin, C., Guber, I., Hashemi, K., & Majo, F. (2015). Tolerance and relative utility: Two proposed indices for comparing change in clinical measurement noise between different populations (repeatability) or measurement methods (agreement). Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 56(9), 5543–5547. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-16091

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free