Quantification of aquatic unicellular diazotrophs by immunolabeled flow cytometry

5Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Unicellular diazotrophs are recognized as important contributors to the aquatic nitrogen cycle. Yet, quantifying the number of aquatic diazotrophs, especially the unicellular fraction, is highly challenging and relies mostly on microscopical and molecular approaches. In this study, a new flow cytometry-based method was developed to quantify unicellular diazotrophs by immunolabeling the nitrogenase enzyme. The quantification method was initially developed using a diazotrophic monoculture (Vibrio natriegens) and verified by different controls as well as various auxiliary approaches such as N2 fixation and confocal laser scanning microscopy. It was evident that only 15–20% of the total number of V. natriegens cells synthesized the nitrogenase enzyme, even though the media was N-limited and anaerobic. This approach was further tested on field samples collected from marine and freshwater environments. Overall, the number of unicellular diazotrophs measured in various aquatic environments ranged from 1 to 6 × 107 cells L−1. However, the fraction of these diazotrophs compared to total bacteria was significantly lower in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea (0.1%) than that collected along the Jordan River (4.7%). Nevertheless, N2 fixation rates per cell were highest in the Mediterranean Sea (~ 90 attomole N cell−1d−1), while lower in the lake and the river measured herein (1.4 to 0.3 attomole N cell−1 d−1, respectively). Following the above, this direct quantification approach can provide new insights on the number and specific contribution of unicellular diazotrophs to total N2 fixation in marine and freshwater environments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geisler, E., Siebner, H., Rahav, E., & Bar-Zeev, E. (2023). Quantification of aquatic unicellular diazotrophs by immunolabeled flow cytometry. Biogeochemistry, 164(3), 509–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-023-01025-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free