Feasibility and Effectiveness of Virtual Group Advance Care Planning Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the transition from in person to virtual advance care planning (ACP) engagement efforts. This pilot initiative evaluated virtual group visits (GVs) and in-person GVs for ACP to determine their feasibility and effectiveness. Methods: Participants included patients in a Geriatric Medicine clinic who were referred by their primary care physician to an ACP GVs intervention. The ACP GVs had 2 sessions, led by clinicians with ACP expertise who facilitated a discussion on patients’ values, goals, and preferences. Participants were provided with technical assistance to support use of the virtual platform. Evaluation included an ACP readiness survey, post-session feedback, GV observations, and electronic health record review at baseline and a 6 month follow-up for goals of care documentation and advance directives. Results: Seventy patients attended 46 ACP GVs from August 2019 to February 2022, including 16 in-person GVs and 54 virtual GVs. At a 6 month follow-up, for virtual GVs participants (n = 54), goals of care documentation increased from 31% to 93%, and advance directives increased from 22% to 30%. For in-person GVs participants (n = 16), goals of care documentation increased from 25% to 100%, and advance directives increased from 69% to 75%. All surveyed patients in both formats would recommend ACP GVs. Conclusion: ACP GVs are feasible and effective for supporting ACP, demonstrating an increase in both goals of care conversations and advance directives completion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yourman, L., Pollner, A., Khatibi, J., Ramos, V., Melkote, V., O’Gorman, A., … Lum, H. D. (2024). Feasibility and Effectiveness of Virtual Group Advance Care Planning Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 41(10), 1238–1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241233687

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free