Semiotics of alterity and the cultural dimensions of Bible translation

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Translated sacred writings from various religious traditions often retain a few selected cultural terms borrowed from the incipient sign system, while other cultural dimensions are translated in ways that can broadly be construed as domestication. By contrast, many Bible translation agencies eschew translation strategies in which cultural terms are borrowed, advocating instead for wholesale domestication. In this article, we develop a theoretical framework for representing the alterity, but not the foreignness, of the Bible in translation. Alterity involves the incipient sign system, namely the biblical languages and their cultural contexts ranging from Iron Age Israel within the context of the Ancient Near East for the Old Testament to Roman Palestine in the first century for the New Testament. Examples from African contexts, including Afrikaans (South Africa), Lokạạ (Nigeria) and Tira (Sudan), illustrate multiple approaches to representing alterity and provide an important corrective to current practice in many Bible translation projects.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naudé, J. A., Miller-Naudé, C. L., & Obono, J. O. (2023). Semiotics of alterity and the cultural dimensions of Bible translation. Acta Theologica, 43(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.38140/at.v43i2.7536

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free