Development of Eucelatoria bryani and Eucelatoria rubentis (Diptera: Tachinidae) in different instars of Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

12Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Development of the tachinids Eucelatoria bryani Sabrosky and E. rubentis (Coquillett) in the last 2 larval instars of the host com earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), was examined. Developmental differences exist between parasitoid species, and within a species, depending on host instar at the time of parasitization. Development was fastest for E. bryani reared in hosts parasitized as 5th instars and was slowest for E. rubentis reared from hosts parasitized as 4th instars. These 2 closely related species also differ in their physiological relationship with H. zea. Second and 3rd instars of E. rubentis become enclosed in a thickened gelatinous sheath, probably of host origin. Such a sheath does not form around larvae of E. bryani. Size of E. bryani was not affected by host instar at the time of parasitization. Host instar at the time of parasitization did not affect the size of E. rubentis females, but E. rubentis males were significantly larger from hosts parasitized as 5th instars. Although both species deposited larger clutches of eggs in older hosts, clutch size was greater in both host-instars for E. bryani than for E. rubentis. Its greater clutch size and lack of size variation in its progeny reared from different host classes indicate that E. bryani is more efficient in using H. zea as a host resource. Given its faster larval development, E. bryani should be a superior larval competitor when both species parasitize H. zea. Interspecific differences may result from E. hryani being more of a specialist parasitoid whereas E. rubentis is more polyphagous.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reitz, S. R. (1996). Development of Eucelatoria bryani and Eucelatoria rubentis (Diptera: Tachinidae) in different instars of Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 89(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/89.1.81

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free