The Effectiveness of Contracted Coalitions: Private Security Contractors in Iraq

26Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The debate on the effectiveness of Private Security Contractors (PSCs) in Iraq has been waged ever since their first appearance. Statists have argued that they are much less effective than regular troops, while neoliberals consider them an effective supplement to regular troops. However, so far, both schools alike have drawn on anecdotal evidence only; yet, such evidence is prone to a high margin of error and does not allow a comparison of different actors. This article addresses these shortfalls by providing hard data, drawn from the Wikileaks "Iraq War logs" data set, on the conduct of PSCs in Iraq and comparing their performance to that of regular troops, that is, the US and Iraqi armed forces. In general, if PSCs are co-deployed alongside regular troops and oversight is institutionalized, their performance supersedes that of poorly trained military personnel, such as the Iraqi military, and in many cases even that of the highly capable US military. © The Author(s) 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petersohn, U. (2013). The Effectiveness of Contracted Coalitions: Private Security Contractors in Iraq. Armed Forces and Society. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X12459712

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free