Randomised trial of methods of extubation in acute and chronic respiratory distress

46Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sixty infants (median gestational age 29 weeks) with acute and 60 infants (median gestational age 25 weeks) with chronic respiratory distress were randomised to be extubated either directly into a headbox or onto 3 cm H 2O nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Our aim was to test the hypothesis that extubation onto nasal CPAP rather than directly into a headbox was more likely to be associated with successful extubation in infants with acute rather than chronic respiratory distress. Overall the failure rate of extubation was approximately 33%, with no significant difference between the infants with acute and chronic respiratory distress. There was no significant difference in the failure rate of extubation among infants randomised to receive nasal CPAP or headbox oxygen in either the acute or chronic respiratory distress groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chan, V., & Greenough, A. (1993). Randomised trial of methods of extubation in acute and chronic respiratory distress. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 68(5 SPEC NO), 570–572. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.68.5_Spec_No.570

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free