Explaining mixed results on science parks performance: Bright and dark sides of the effects of inter-organisational knowledge transfer relationships

4Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the recent past, several researchers explored the added-values of Science Parks. On the basis of empirical research, some questioned the assumed benefits of the science park model, whereas others reported positive outcomes. As a result, mixed findings regarding the benefits of science parks for firms can be observed. These mixed empirical findings require a theoretical explanation. This paper argues that different levels and types of knowledge exchange behaviour of science park firms could be one of the theoretical explanations for these mixed findings. The literature on networks mainly stresses the benefits of networking in general, and networking between firms located on science parks in particular. This paper proposes that networks can have both positive (knowledge sharing) and negative effects (opportunistic behavior and knowledge spillovers) for firms located on science parks. When the latter occurs, location on a science park might produce negative effects. A conceptual model is developed that summarises our theoretical arguments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chan, K. Y. A., Oerlemans, L. A. G., & Pretorius, M. W. (2009). Explaining mixed results on science parks performance: Bright and dark sides of the effects of inter-organisational knowledge transfer relationships. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 20(2), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.7166/20-2-759

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free