Volunteering for Infection: Participant Perspectives on a Hepatitis C Virus Controlled Human Infection Model

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Ethical human subjects research requires participants to be treated safely and respectfully, yet much bioethical debate takes place without participants. We aim to address this gap in the context of controlled human infection model (CHIM) research. Based upon our own experience as study participants, and bolstered by a survey of 117 potential hepatitis C virus CHIM participants, we present ideas to inform efficient, ethical, and scientifically useful study design. We advocate for full protocol transparency, higher compensation, commitment to the rapid dissemination of study results, and proactive efforts to detail risk-minimization efforts as early as possible in the recruitment process, among other measures. We encourage researchers to proactively partner with volunteer advocacy organizations that promote collective representation of volunteers to maximize their agency, and guard against ethical issues arising from healthy human subjects research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eberts, J. D., Zimmer-Harwood, P., Elsey, J. W. B., Fraser-Urquhart, A., & Smiley, T. (2023). Volunteering for Infection: Participant Perspectives on a Hepatitis C Virus Controlled Human Infection Model. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 77, S224–S230. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad350

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free