Risk Factors for Re-Tear of the Meniscus Following Meniscus Repair with Concomitant ACL Reconstruction

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the rate of meniscal re-tear in patients with concomitant ACL reconstruction, with specific focus on surgical factors and patient demographic factors. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent meniscal repair with concomitant ACL reconstruction at our institution over a seven-year period. Demographic and case variables were assessed, including sex, age, height, weight, BMI, medial versus lateral repairs, ACL graft type, ACL reconstruction technique, meniscus repair technique, and post-operative weight bearing status. Failure of repair was defined as need for repeat surgery on the same meniscus. Results: There were 191 patients included in the study; of those 118 did not need further surgery on the meniscus at a minimum of 2 years post operation while 73 did have a re-operation on the same meniscus (rate of failure 38.2%). There were significant differences between re-operation and non-re-operation groups based on ACL graft type (54% failure for allograft vs. 30/23% failure for both autograft cohorts) and meniscal repair side (46% re-tear rate for medial meniscus vs. 17% for lateral meniscus). The pediatric (under 18 years old) cohort included 57 patients; 28 patients required additional meniscal surgery and 29 did not (rate of re-operation 49%). Conclusions: The overall failure rate of meniscus repair was nearly 40%. Risk factors for re-tear of the meniscus were repair of the medial meniscus and allograft usage for ACL reconstruction. The rate of re-tear in patients under 18 was nearly 50%, which is higher than in the adult population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gronbeck, K. R., Nystrom, S., Perkins, B., & Tompkins, M. A. (2025). Risk Factors for Re-Tear of the Meniscus Following Meniscus Repair with Concomitant ACL Reconstruction. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14165881

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free