The impact of organizational context on the levels of cross-border E-commerce adoption in Chinese SMEs: The moderating role of environmental context

15Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the rapid technological developments, cross-border e-commerce (CBEC) as a sector is also expanding rapidly. In the past couple of decades, China has become a major force in promoting and developing CBEC and, therefore, it was needed to explore the various antecedents and outcomes of Chinese CBEC to expand the understanding and existing CBEC scholarship. Ample studies have been conducted to understand the antecedents and outcomes of CBEC. However, limited studies have explored such variables which can mitigate the adoption of CBEC. With this background, this empirical study was focused on addressing this gap by studying the moderating role of environmental context between organizational context and the four levels of CBEC adoption with the help of a technology-organization-environment framework. SMEs operating in China were targeted for data collection, where data were collected through an online survey. A final sample size of 208 was recorded. It was found that the organizational context has a direct and positive impact on all four levels of CBEC adoption. Furthermore, the moderating role of environmental context on Level 1 and 2 was not supported. Finally, the moderating role of environmental context on Level 3 and 4 was supported by the data. It was concluded that the organizational context plays a significant role in shaping CBEC at all four levels, whereas the environmental context has the potential to mitigate the relationships between organizational context and CBEC Level 3 and 4.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdulkarem, A., & Hou, W. (2021). The impact of organizational context on the levels of cross-border E-commerce adoption in Chinese SMEs: The moderating role of environmental context. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(7), 2732–2749. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16070150

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free