Vitamin D deficiency and length of pediatric intensive care unit stay: a prospective observational study

37Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Due to the limited data available in the pediatric population and lack of interventional studies to show that administration of vitamin D indeed improves clinical outcomes, opinion is still divided as to whether it is just an innocent bystander or a marker of severe disease. Our objective was therefore to estimate the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in children admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) and to examine its association with duration of ICU stay and other key clinical outcomes. Methods: We prospectively enrolled children aged 1 month–17 years admitted to the ICU over a period of 8 months (n = 101). The primary objectives were to estimate the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (serum 25 (OH) <20 ng/mL) at ‘admission’ and to examine its association with length of ICU stay. Results: The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was 74 % (95 % CI: 65–88). The median (IQR) duration of ICU stay was significantly longer in ‘vitamin D deficient’ children (7 days; 2–12) than in those with ‘no vitamin D deficiency’ (3 days; 2–5; p = 0.006). On multivariable analysis, the association between length of ICU stay and vitamin D deficiency remained significant, even after adjusting for key baseline variables, diagnosis, illness severity (PIM-2), PELOD, and need for fluid boluses, ventilation, inotropes and mortality [adjusted mean difference (95 % CI): 3.5 days (0.50–6.53); p = 0.024]. Conclusions: We observed a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in critically ill children in our study population. Vitamin D deficient children had a longer duration of ICU stay as compared to others.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sankar, J., Lotha, W., Ismail, J., Anubhuti, C., Meena, R. S., & Sankar, M. J. (2016). Vitamin D deficiency and length of pediatric intensive care unit stay: a prospective observational study. Annals of Intensive Care, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-015-0102-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free