Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Standard Stents in Patients with Stenosis in a Native Coronary Artery

  • Moses J
  • Leon M
  • Popma J
  • et al.
4.2kCitations
Citations of this article
508Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Preliminary reports of studies involving simple coronary lesions indicate that a sirolimus-eluting stent significantly reduces the risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary revascularization. Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial comparing a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent in 1058 patients at 53 centers in the United States who had a newly diagnosed lesion in a native coronary artery. The coronary disease in these patients was complex because of the frequent presence of diabetes (in 26 percent of patients), the high percentage of patients with longer lesions (mean, 14.4 mm), and small vessels (mean, 2.80 mm). The primary end point was failure of the target vessel (a composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, and repeated percutaneous or surgical revascularization of the target vessel) within 270 days. Results The rate of failure of the target vessel was reduced from 21.0 percent with a standard stent to 8.6 percent with a sirolimus-eluting ...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moses, J. W., Leon, M. B., Popma, J. J., Fitzgerald, P. J., Holmes, D. R., O’Shaughnessy, C., … Kuntz, R. E. (2003). Sirolimus-Eluting Stents versus Standard Stents in Patients with Stenosis in a Native Coronary Artery. New England Journal of Medicine, 349(14), 1315–1323. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa035071

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free