Abstract
Conductive argumentation, as a separate category of reasoning, has experienced a revival. In 2010, the University of Windsor's Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation, and Rhetoric dedicated a two-day symposium to the topic and later published the proceedings. In this article, I argue against the existence of conductive arguments as a usefully distinct type of argument. Some of what are deemed conductive arguments are simply inductive arguments and some are best construed as subsets of the constituents of what is commonly called a position paper.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Possin, K. (2016). Conductive arguments: Why is this still a thing? Informal Logic, 36(4), 563–593. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v36i4.4527
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.