Conductive arguments: Why is this still a thing?

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Conductive argumentation, as a separate category of reasoning, has experienced a revival. In 2010, the University of Windsor's Centre for Research in Reasoning, Argumentation, and Rhetoric dedicated a two-day symposium to the topic and later published the proceedings. In this article, I argue against the existence of conductive arguments as a usefully distinct type of argument. Some of what are deemed conductive arguments are simply inductive arguments and some are best construed as subsets of the constituents of what is commonly called a position paper.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Possin, K. (2016). Conductive arguments: Why is this still a thing? Informal Logic, 36(4), 563–593. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v36i4.4527

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free