Effect of Serum Sources and Colostral Whey on Bovine Semen Quality and Spermatozoa Immunoglobulin G Immunofluorescence

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Heifer, bull, fetal calf sera, and colostral whey were used to evaluate the influence of protein concentrations on percent progressive motility, head-to-head agglutination, acrosomal integrity, and immunoglobulin G immunofluorescence of bovine spermatozoa using ejaculates from 10 bulls. In the first experiment, 10% (vol/vol) addition of undiluted colostral whey resulted in the highest head-to-head agglutination, acrosomal integrity, and immunoglobulin G immunofluorescence. Ten percent (vol/vol) addition of whey diluted to a protein concentration equivalent to fetal calf serum produced significantly lower agglutination, acrosomal integrity, and immunoglobulin G immunofluorescence. Fetal calf serum was unable to produce agglutination and immunoglobulin G immunofluorescence of bovine spermatozoa. Heifer and bull sera produced similar responses for all seminal measurements. In Experiment 2, unheated whey and heifer serum resulted in higher response for all variables than heat inactivated whey and heifer serum. Whey treatment produced greater spermatozoal motility, agglutination, acrosomal integrity; and immunoglobulin G immunofluorescence than treatment with heifer serum. Spermatozoal immunofluorescence indicated antibodies in normal whey, bull, and heifer serum bound to spermatozoal membranes at the acrosomal region. Colostral whey was an effective source of agglutinin factor. Normal unheated whey and heifer serum did not cause sperm damage or immobilization. © 1986, American Dairy Science Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jimenez, D. A., Chandler, J. E., Adkinson, R. W., Barta, O., Ingraham, R. H., & Saxton, A. (1986). Effect of Serum Sources and Colostral Whey on Bovine Semen Quality and Spermatozoa Immunoglobulin G Immunofluorescence. Journal of Dairy Science, 69(10), 2704–2710. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80717-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free