Tam and e-learning adoption: A philosophical scrutiny of tam, Its limitations, And prescriptions for e-learning adoption research

8Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

TAM and TAM derived theories have been very popular for investigating users’ e-learning adoption/post-adoption behavior. However, several philosophical holes as well as a number of limitations of TAM research have been pointed by several leading researchers in the recent years. In this paper, we discuss the philosophical holes and present our reflections and possible prescriptions about these holes while conducting research on e-learning adoption/post-adoption. We also discuss the limitations of TAM research and present prescriptions about how e-learning adoption research can be conducted by addressing these limitations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Najmul Islam, A. K. M., Mäntymäki, M., Azad, N., & Samiul Islam, S. M. (2014). Tam and e-learning adoption: A philosophical scrutiny of tam, Its limitations, And prescriptions for e-learning adoption research. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 445, pp. 164–175). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45526-5_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free