What makes us laugh? Investigations into automatic humor classification

5Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Most scholarly works in the field of computational detection of humour derive their inspiration from the incongruity theory. Incongruity is an indispensable facet in drawing a line between humorous and non-humorous occurrences but is immensely inadequate in shedding light on what actually made the particular occurrence a funny one. Classical theories like Script-based Semantic Theory of Humour and General Verbal Theory of Humour try and achieve this feat to an adequate extent. In this paper we adhere to a more holistic approach towards classification of humour based on these classical theories with a few improvements and revisions. Through experiments based on our linear approach and performed on large data-sets of jokes, we are able to demonstrate the adaptability and show componentizability of our model, and that a host of classification techniques can be used to overcome the challenging problem of distinguishing between various categories and sub-categories of jokes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bali, T., Ahuja, V., & Singh, N. (2018). What makes us laugh? Investigations into automatic humor classification. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Modeling of PFople’s Opinions, PersonaLity, and Emotions in Social Media, PEOPLES 2018 at the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HTL 2018 (pp. 1–9). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w18-1101

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free