Influence of different concentrations of alcoholic-alkaline modified enset starch as the stabilizing agent on low-fat set yogurt quality

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of alcohol-alkaline modified enset starch on the quality of low-fat set yogurt. This study employed factorial design with stabilizer percentage having three levels (1%, 2%, and 3%) and stabilizer type with three levels (Native Enset Starch (NES), Modified Enset Starch (MES) using alcohol-alkaline treatment, and Corn Starch (CS)). The developed yogurt was stored in refrigerator (5°C) and the physicochemical, microbial and sensory properties were evaluated on the 1st, 7th, and 14th days of storage. The low-fat set yogurt with 3% MES showed a pH, total soluble solids, and titratable acidity of 5.00, 18.00 °Brix, and 0.41% on the 1st day, 4.52; 17.93 °Brix and 0.44% on the 7th day; and 4.31, 17.05 °Brix and 0.50% on the 14th days, respectively. The low-fat yogurt with 3% MES had the lowest syneresis (6.05%), while the control yogurt had the highest syneresis (10.05%). Yogurt sample with 3% of CS had the highest L* value (89.01) while the yogurt with 3% MES had the lowest (78.85). Yogurt with 3% MES had the highest viscosity (387.9 mPa s), whereas the control had the lowest viscosity (245.6 mPa s). The highest colony forming units (5.65 × 103 CFU/mL) was detected in the yogurt sample with 2% MES, while the lowest (1.55 × 103 CFU/mL) was found in the control yogurt samples. Therefore, for the optimum physicochemical, functional, sensory and microbial properties, 3% MES is recommended as suitable stabilizer to use in the low-fat set yogurt.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keyore, A. A., Dadi, D. W., Satheesh, N., & Woldemariam, H. W. (2024). Influence of different concentrations of alcoholic-alkaline modified enset starch as the stabilizing agent on low-fat set yogurt quality. International Journal of Food Properties, 27(1), 753–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2024.2360973

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free