Clinical management protocols for community pharmacist-led management of urinary tract infections: a review of the grey literature and quality appraisal

8Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Pharmacist-led management of urinary tract infections has been introduced as a service in the United Kingdom, Canada, United States of America, New Zealand, and Australia. The management of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections by community pharmacists has gained increasing attention as a potential avenue to alleviate the burden on primary healthcare services. Aim: The objectives of the review were to: (1) identify protocols for community pharmacist management of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women aged 16–65 years; (2) outline their key components; and (3) appraise the quality of protocols. Method: A grey literature search was undertaken for protocols intended for use by community pharmacists for the management of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women aged 16–65 years, met the definition of a clinical management protocol and written in English. Their quality was appraised using the Appraisal Guidelines for Research and Evaluation version II instrument. Results: Forty of the 274 records screened were included. Content analysis identified ten key components: common signs/symptoms, differential diagnosis, red flags/referral, choice of empirical antibiotic therapy, nonprescription medications, nonpharmacological/self-care advice, patient eligibility criteria, patient follow-up, dipstick testing recommendations, and recommendations on antimicrobial resistance. The lowest scoring domains in the quality assessment were ‘Editorial Independence’ and ‘Rigour of Development’. Only four protocols were deemed high-quality. Conclusion: The review demonstrates that clinical management protocols for pharmacist-led management of urinary tract infections consist of similar recommendations, despite variation in international practice. However, the findings highlight a deficiency in the quality of most clinical management protocols governing pharmacist-led urinary tract infection management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Budden, M., Gilbertson, D., Chung, S., Benrimoj, S. I., Mardones, F., & Dineen-Griffin, S. (2024, December 1). Clinical management protocols for community pharmacist-led management of urinary tract infections: a review of the grey literature and quality appraisal. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01768-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free